News
Nanobots make themselves into models
Intel is trying to see if millions of tiny robots can work together to create a coffee cup, or a model of a truck.
Intel's lab in Pittsburgh, affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University, showed off a technology concept at the Intel Developer Forum last week called Dynamic Physical Rendering, which could ultimately lead to a shape-shifting fabric.
Apply the right voltage and software program and the flat piece of fabric turns into a three-dimensional model of a car. Change those parameters and it transforms into a cube.
"Rather than look at a 3D model on a CAD (computer aided design) program, a physical model would be manifested on your desk," said Babu Pillai, who, along with Jason Campbell, is heading up the project. "The material would change shape under software control."
The trick is that the fabric would not be a continuous piece of material. Instead, it would be composed of millions of independent silicon spheres covered in electronic actuators -- half-capacitors or electromagnets. By applying charges to different actuators, different points on the sphere would be repelled or attracted to similar points on other spheres. The co-ordinated movement of the spheres would then cause the fabric to assume a shape.
The intelligent fabric doesn't exist yet, but Intel has created prototypes of the components that make up intelligent fabric. It has, for instance, created spheres measuring about a millimetre in diameter. First, a piece of silicon cut into the shape of a star with many arms is produced. The stress of the material causes it to be rolled up into a ball.
The group has also demonstrated how small groups of actuators could move objects. In one demonstration, two cylinders covered in rows of electromagnets are propelled across a surface through repulsion and attraction. The cylinders do not contain moving parts.
The spheres and the actuators are currently made separately, but in the future they could be made together on standard silicon processes, said Pillai. A layer containing the actuators would be laid down in a silicon wafer and then the material that would form the skeleton of the sphere would be applied on top of it. Star shapes would then be cut from the wafer. When stress forces the silicon to curl up, the layer of actuators would be there on the outside, like the shell of a woodlouse.
Hardware prototypes of the fabric could be ready in about five years, Pillai predicted.
That, however, is the easy part. Coming up with software to control the movement of the spheres looks to be far more difficult.
"How do you program 10 million nodes to work together?" he asked rhetorically. "Essentially it is a robotic system with thousands of robots moving against each other in a constrained way."
Pillar and Campbell think that the solution may lie in developing programs where every step does not have to be planned. A simulation program demonstrated this. In the demo, 40,000 robots, represented by light dots, move about as each tries to accomplish a single task: fill in any gaps between itself and other robots. The computer, meanwhile, sets external boundaries to the field over which the robots can jostle.
In the simulation, the software robots are grouped into five squares. After a few minutes of bumping and grinding, the five squares begin to spell out the I-n-t-e-l of the company logo.
Even if they can solve this problem, they would then have to conquer the problem of getting the spheres to co-ordinate their action in three dimensions.
Around 20 people are working on the project. The Pittsburgh lab is one of a collection that Intel has built next to prestigious universities. The company also has labs in Berkeley and Cambridge, for instance. Carnegie Mellon is one of the chief centres for robotics research.
More about Gadgets
- Segway-riding MP Opik risks arrest September 10, 2008
- German police raid Hyundai IT at IFA September 01, 2008
- Robocop on the beat by 2084? August 14, 2008
- Scientists closer to not seeing invisibility cloak August 11, 2008
- TfL puts Oyster's future in question August 11, 2008

- OpenOfficeMouse has frankly preposterous 18 buttons, joystick
- EMI Abbey Road Live: Instant gig recording
- Sony BDP-S760 Blu-ray player: Super bit-mapping reality enhancer
- Nokia Booklet 3G hits US: Hands-on verdict
- Lady GaGa Monster Heartbeats: They're plastic but they still have fun
- The 6 worst video game samples in rap music

- OpenOfficeMouse has frankly preposterous 18 buttons, joystick
- Crumbs! Large Hadron Collider suffers snack-related bird mishap
- Top 10 geek recipes
- Digg is dead: Twitter killed it and Google helped bury the corpse
- Why won't they die? The tech we won't forget
- Plug versus Plug
- Interview: The man who makes killer robots for the US military
- Every BBC iPlayer device tested
- Secret Cinema goes Alien: In Shoreditch, no-one can hear you tweet
- Interview: The Space Station's IT guys
- NSA to store yottabytes in Utah data centre
- Space Station IT: High technology
- MIT Affective Intelligent Driving Agent: Robotic backseat driver
- The three strikes rule is not only illogical, but morally wrong and a waste of public money
- WowWee Rovio, Joebot, Cinemin and RoboRover: Red-hot robot action



